Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modified method of patency judgement using patency capsule prior to capsule endoscopy in clinical practice.
Miyazu, Takahiro; Osawa, Satoshi; Tamura, Satoshi; Tani, Shinya; Ishida, Natsuki; Matsuura, Tomoharu; Yamade, Mihoko; Iwaizumi, Moriya; Hamaya, Yasushi; Furuta, Takahisa; Sugimoto, Ken.
Affiliation
  • Miyazu T; First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Osawa S; Department of Endoscopic and Photodynamic Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan. sososawa@hama-med.ac.jp.
  • Tamura S; First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Tani S; First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Ishida N; Department of Endoscopic and Photodynamic Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu, 431-3192, Japan.
  • Matsuura T; First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Yamade M; First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Iwaizumi M; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Hamaya Y; First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Furuta T; Center for Clinical Research, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
  • Sugimoto K; First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 14335, 2022 08 22.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35995963
In 2012, Japan approved the use of a tag-less patency capsule (PC), which evaluates gastrointestinal patency before small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). This study aimed to evaluate the validity of our modification on the passage criteria for this PC in clinical practice. We retrospectively enrolled 326 consecutive patients who underwent PC examination before SBCE. If X-ray could not reveal the PC in the body during the judgement time (30-33 h after ingestion), we defined it as 'estimated patency' and performed SBCE. We employed plain computed tomography (CT) for the second judgement, as needed. The overall patency rate was 95.1%. By X-ray, 41 (12.6%) patients were judged to have 'estimated patency', and SBCE could be safely performed. Plain CT judgement was necessary in 106 patients (32.5%). One PC case had a residual coating film associated with stenosis in a patient with Crohn's disease (CD), and one (0.3%) SBCE case had capsule retention resulting from false CT judgement. Multivariate analysis revealed that established CD and inpatient were factors related to no-patency. In conclusion, PC is useful for examining gastrointestinal patency, keeping in mind CT misjudgement. If PC was not found in the body via X-ray, performing SBCE as 'estimated patency' seemed appropriate.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Crohn Disease / Capsule Endoscopy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Crohn Disease / Capsule Endoscopy Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: